| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Abhi,
Yes. I will agree with you on that. We need to say group address frame to cover both data frame and management frame.
I consider that as editorial and have sent an offline email to Edward.
Best,
Po-Kai
From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 9:39 AM
To: Huang, Po-kai <po-kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-Group-addressed-frame-beacon
Hi Po-Kai,
Thanks for responding.
In that case, should we consider renaming the main clause as follows?
33.3.9 Multi-link group addressed
datadelivery
Regards,
Abhi
From: Huang, Po-kai <po-kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 9:17 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-Group-addressed-frame-beacon
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Hi Abhi,
I think since beacon frame is management frame, so if we do create clause for Group addressed management frame, then logically it should generally cover beacon frame as a subclause unless we say it in the group addressed management clause that beacon frame is excluded for whatever general rule.
However, I do not have problem if we want to focus on draft text now and deal with clause rearrangement later.
Best,
Po-Kai
From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 9:04 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-Group-addressed-frame-beacon
Hello Abhi,
I am fine with it. Since the name of the TTT is "MLO-Multi-link group addressed data delivery: Beacon transmission", I thought the text is intended for group address delivery.
Regards,
Edward
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:00 PM Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Edward,
The beaconing operation (covered in this PDT) is not specific to group address delivery and applies to the overall MLO feature.Therefore, I think it should be placed under MLO General clause (33.3.1).
I am open to other suggestions.
Regards,
Abhi
From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 8:29 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT-MAC-MLO-Group-addressed-frame-beacon
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
Hello Duncan,
Based on the SFD, I create the following subclauses in the tentative D0.1:
33.3.9 Multi-link group addressed data delivery
33.3.9.1 Beacon transmission
33.3.9.2 Group addressed data frame
33.3.3.3 Group addressed management frame
Do you prefer to place your text under 33.3.9.1 or keep the current proposal to place your text under a general section? Please kindly advise.
Thanks,
Edward
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:55 PM Duncan Ho <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Group-addressed-frame-delivery TTT members, and all,
I’ve uploaded 1488r0 here. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
Thanks,
Duncan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1