Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

Hi Jianhan

One more comment. Should the following text be:

“The pilot subcarriers of a 996+484 tone MRU consist of the pilot subcarriers of the 996 484-tone and 484 242-tone RUs that make up the 996+484 tone MRU.”

 

Thanks,

Bin

 

From: Bin Tian <btian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 5:15 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

Hi Jianhan

Thanks for preparing the draft. There are several mandatory statements in the draft like below should be conditional mandatory on the supporting BW.  Please check the motions in SFD which listed the conditions.

 

“It is mandatory for non-AP STA to support the transmission and reception of 484+242 tone MRU, 996+484 tone MRU, 2×996+484 tone MRU, 3×996-tone MRU, and 3×996+484 tone MRU in OFDMA.”

 

Thanks,

Bin

 

 

From: Jianhan Liu <jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 3:08 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

Ho Wookbong and Lei,

 

I removed the 2x996 from the MRU. please see the following link for updates:

 

 

Thanks,

Jianhan

 

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 11:49 AM Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Jianhan,

 

Thanks. That is good.

 

My additional suggestion is to make a table like below for MRUs in addition to figures.

Best regards,

Wook Bong Lee

 

 

From: Jianhan Liu [mailto:jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 11:44 AM
To: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

 

Hi Wookbong,

 

What is your suggestion? We can remove 996x2 as a single RU as Lei huang suggested.

 

Thanks,

JIanhan

 

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 9:07 AM Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Jianhan,

Thanks for your effort.

I have one question.
In page 8 second to the bottom block, it says 2x996 tone MRU in 320 MHz transmission.
But this is for non-OFDMA sentence. I think 2x996 is not supported in 320 MHz for non-OFDMA.

Also have one suggestion.
Currently you have figured to specify what are allowed MRUs in both small MRU and large MRU.
Is it possible that you can add table as well?
Table like table 27-7 to table 27-9.

Best regards,
Wook Bong Lee


Sent with BlackBerry Work (www.blackberry.com)
________________________________
From: Jianhan Liu <jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sep 17, 2020 11:58 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

Hi Ron,

Please see the updated document according to your comments.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1447-02-00be-pdt-subcarriers-and-resource-allocation-for-multiple-rus.docx<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mentor.ieee.org_802.11_dcn_20_11-2D20-2D1447-2D02-2D00be-2Dpdt-2Dsubcarriers-2Dand-2Dresource-2Dallocation-2Dfor-2Dmultiple-2Drus.docx&d=DwMFaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=F1dvNUi0uHkT3MFJNe2F126UHE49M7tR_CIkwdjzKQ4&m=t3HOhFowXaNP6cBA4OvgwyDqTaghlqXviXW5iZi6Cm8&s=51YJYZ3TwWxWmK4hHOhWiBXLZ1ysf00BpNUk4gdPPXM&e=>

Thanks,
Jianhan

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:03 AM Ron Porat <000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:000009a0da80e877-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi Jianhan,


A small typo Page 6, line 3: “The data subcarriers of a 996+484+484 tone MRU consist of the…”, Typo.

Suggestion:  mandatory support in pages 8 and 11 - may be good to combine with BW support (meaning make it conditional support based on BW)
“It is mandatory for non-AP STA to support the transmission and reception of 484+242 tone MRU, 996+484 tone MRU, 2×996-tone MRU, 2×996+484 tone MRU, 3×996-tone MRU, and 3×996+484 tone MRU in OFDMA”
Thanks,
Ron



From: Lei Huang [mailto:nusleihuang@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:nusleihuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2020 12:51 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

Hello Jianhan,


Thanks for preparing this draft text.



I have a comment. A 2x996-tone RU is treated as a MRU in your draft text but is treated as a single RU in 20/1371r4. Such an inconsistency needs to be solved. Personally I prefer treating a 2x996-tone RU as a single RU due to the defined 160 MHz BW EHT PPDU.



Best regards,

Lei


From: Jianhan Liu <jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 8:39 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs"

Dear all,

The draft text for "Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs" has been uploaded to the server. You can access it with the following link.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1447-00-00be-pdt-subcarriers-and-resource-allocation-for-multiple-rus.docx<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mentor.ieee.org_802.11_dcn_20_11-2D20-2D1447-2D00-2D00be-2Dpdt-2Dsubcarriers-2Dand-2Dresource-2Dallocation-2Dfor-2Dmultiple-2Drus.docx&d=DwMFaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=F1dvNUi0uHkT3MFJNe2F126UHE49M7tR_CIkwdjzKQ4&m=t3HOhFowXaNP6cBA4OvgwyDqTaghlqXviXW5iZi6Cm8&s=6TN58v9t9pNT0k6DQwRMycRx577SbX-qgqbGPXz0abY&e=>

Your comments are welcome.

Thanks,
Jianhan


________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.ieee.org_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DSTDS-2D802-2D11-2DTGBE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=F1dvNUi0uHkT3MFJNe2F126UHE49M7tR_CIkwdjzKQ4&m=t3HOhFowXaNP6cBA4OvgwyDqTaghlqXviXW5iZi6Cm8&s=fPvV4J4Au4xZzuq827q041HxtawU3nQrqVEYFqx0h7A&e=>

________________________________

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.or<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__listserv.ieee.org_cgi-2Dbin_wa-3FSUBED1-3DSTDS-2D802-2D11-2DTGBE-26A-3D1&d=DwMFaQ&c=JfeWlBa6VbDyTXraMENjy_b_0yKWuqQ4qY-FPhxK4x8w-TfgRBDyeV4hVQQBEgL2&r=F1dvNUi0uHkT3MFJNe2F126UHE49M7tR_CIkwdjzKQ4&m=t3HOhFowXaNP6cBA4OvgwyDqTaghlqXviXW5iZi6Cm8&s=fPvV4J4Au4xZzuq827q041HxtawU3nQrqVEYFqx0h7A&e=>

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1