Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Payam, No that does not affect 1256, as we separated “default mapping” and “TID-mapping negotiation”. Thanks Laurent From: Payam Torab <torab@xxxxxxxx> Thanks Alfred. @Laurent Cariou does this SP affect your 1256 PDT (tid-to-link mapping).
Just confused if this has any implications on ongoing R1 work. From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> Hello Payam, This SP came from the remaining items (highlighted in yellow) of the "TGbe spec text volunteers and status". So the SP was asking if having that particular row (and respective motions) in R1. I think there were some brief comments prior
to the SP being run but dont recall the details. Perhaps Yongho (POC) may provide some additional details on it.
Alfred On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:42 PM Payam Torab <torab@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
-- Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair, Qualcomm Technologies Inc. Cell #: +1 858 263 9445 Office #: +1 858 658 5302 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |