Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 1046 SP1 discussion: restricted SPs

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Thanks Chunyu – can you please clarify if restricted TWT is mandatory for APs ( I guess support for announcing restricted service periods (SPs))?

Regards,

Vinko..

From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 3:24 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 1046 SP1 discussion: restricted SPs

Hi, all:

Thanks all for the discussion during the meeting. We have a revised SP text for 1046r5 SP1 based on the feedbacks received:

•Do you agree to add to the TGbe SFD (in R1), a mode where an AP may announce restricted service periods (SPs) such that:

oAny EHT STA that supports following the announced restricted SPs, and associated to the AP, shall end its TXOP before the start of the restricted SP(s)

oThe support for the restricted SPs is optional for the EHT Non-AP STA

Note: such restricted SPs are intended to provide more predictable latency performance for latency sensitive traffic

Hope this can be a good common ground the group can accept.

Let us know if you have any comment/question or thoughts to share.

Thanks.
Chunyu

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1