Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] [Suspected Marketing Mail] [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion of 11-20/1122 - 802.11be Architecture/Association Discussion

Hi Jose,

 

For the third bullet you mentioned, it’s fine to define the MLO entities with some simple model in R1,but we shall allow the group member to consider some variant of MLO entity for the low cost, low latency, low power consumption and higher TP purpose in R2, which is align with the principle of SFD.

That the MLO entities (currently called MLD AP and non-AP MLD STA) should be defined as APs and non-AP STAs with new capabilities (not new entities that contain STAs and APs)

 

 

Thanks

 

Best Regards

 

Jay Yang

 

From: Joseph Levy <jslevy@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: 2020年10月28日 3:33
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Suspected Marketing Mail] [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion of 11-20/1122 - 802.11be Architecture/Association Discussion

 

Dear All, 

 

As time did not allow for a full discussion of 11-20/1122 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-1122-03-00be-802-11be-architecture-association-discussion.pptx) at yesterday's MAC ad hoc meeting, I'm kicking off this discussion via the TGbe reflector.  

 

If you have a question, statement, or comment to make on this topic please reply to this email discussion thread 

 

I believe it is critical to the progress of 802.11be that:

  1. There is an agreed sensible and clear top down architecture for MLO
  2. That precise use of terms is important (e.g. AP, STA, link, device, ...)
  3. That the MLO entities (currently called MLD AP and non-AP MLD STA) should be defined as APs and non-AP STAs with new capabilities (not new entities that contain STAs and APs)

The time to make these decisions is now as these decisions greatly impact the text, scope, and organization of the 802.11be amendment.  

 

Please note that the original 11-20/1122r0 was posted 21 July, it has taken quite a while for this discussion to reach the TGbe MAC ad hoc for discussion.

 

Please share your thoughts and comments.  

-- 

Regards,

Joseph Levy

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1