Hi Jianhan and all TTTs,
Thanks for your preparing and updating the PDT.
In table 36-X3 to X5, for the description of disallowed MRU in each BW, the Note has been used.
MRU indices are defined for each BW, and some of the disallowed MRU indexes are not used when BW is smaller than 80MHz, so it seems good to modify the note like as “ Not supported in BW ≥ 80 MHz “
Best regards,
Dongguk
From: 천진영 [mailto:jiny.chun@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 4:50 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] (2) [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] please add the "PDT Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs Update"
Hi Myeongjin,
Thank you for reflecting your comment.
I’m fine with that. And for 40/80MHz EHT PPDU, please refer Table 27-8/9, too.
Best regards,
Jinyoung
From: Myeongjin KIM [mailto:mj1108.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2021 12:18 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] (2) [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] please add the "PDT Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs Update"
Hi Jinyoung,
Thank you for your comment.
I think that we can add the following example sentence for the better clarification of table,
- For 20 MHz EHT PPDU, the indices for MRUs are defined based on the indices of RU in Table 27-7 (Data and pilot subcarrier indices for RUs in a 20 MHz HE PPDU and in a non-OFDMA 20 MHz HE PPDU).
I will reflect your comment in the revised PDT.
Thank you!
Best regards,
MJ
--------- Original Message ---------
Sender : 천진영 <jiny.chun@xxxxxxx>
Date : 2021-01-15 11:41 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] please add the "PDT Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs Update"
Hi Jianhan and all TTTs,
Thank you for preparing and sharing the PDT.
Table 36-X1 to X5 says such as ‘52-tone RU 2 + 26-tone RU 2’. But there’s no such index information of each RU where is 2 among 52-tone RUs.
How about to add the index definition or add the index in previous figures, for the clarification?
If I’m missing some point, please let me know.
Best regards,
Jinyoung
|
Hi Jianhan and all TTTs,
Thanks for preparing the PDTs. I see you have updated several figures in the PDT, e.g., reflect that the two small RUs (RU26 and RU52) are not contiguous. But there is no instruction or reminder to the editor. Could you add some instructions or reminder?
regards
于健 Ross Jian Yu
Huawei Technologies
发件人: Jianhan Liu [mailto:jianhanliu@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年1月15日 4:10
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] please add the "PDT Subcarriers and Resource Allocation for Multiple RUs Update"
Hi Alfred, Tianyu and Sigurd,
|
|
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
|
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1