Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Laurent. Thanks for your comments and I updated the document based on it. Please see the attached documents. For your comment regarding the inheritance rule of option 2-2, I would like to explain it to e-mail for discussion. Actually, I'm considering inheritance rule for a MLD probe request (i.e. probe request variant multi-link element). I think we can also use the inheritance rule to request the common partial information in MLD probe request for optimization. In option 2-2, If a Request element is included in the MLD probe request frame body, - In case of the request of different partial information for an AP corresponding to the Link ID field of the Per-STA Control field, another Request element is included in Per-STA profile subelement of probe request variant multi-link element. - In case of the request of same partial information for an AP corresponding to the Link ID field of the Per-STA Control field, a Request element is absent and the Complete profile subfield is set to 0. However, if the Complete profile subfield is set to 1, it means the STA requests complete information for the AP . In this way, if we apply the inheritance rule to the MLD probe request, we can cover both cases (request of same partial information for all APs and different partial information per each AP) and reduce overhead of MLD probe request. Thanks. Best, Namyeong. From: Cariou, Laurent [mailto:laurent.cariou@xxxxxxxxx] Hi Namyeong, Thanks for the document. See attached some comments/suggestions. Best, Laurent From: Namyeong Kim <namyeong.kim@xxxxxxx> Hi Alfred. Could you please add the following document to the PDT agenda in 11be MAC? - 20/1667r3, PDT-MAC-MLO-Discovery-Information-Request Hi TTT members of “MLD Discovery: Information Request” and all. In the last meeting, we have discussed about partial information request and selected the constructure of MLD probe request for partial information among several options by voting. As a result, we choose the option 2 (the request of the different set of partial information for each AP individually) basically and I updated the document based on our SP result. And I uploaded the revision 3 of PDT document and we’ll continue the discussion to define partial information request in detail (we need to decide on the detail of option. Only one of option 2-1 and option 2-2 will be included in the spec text). Please review it let me know any comments. Thanks. Best, Namyeong From: Namyeong Kim [mailto:namyeong.kim@xxxxxxx] Dear TTT members and all Thanks very much for comments. I have uploaded an PDT for MLO Discovery: Information Request (1667r2). I added the section 9.4.2.295b3 for complete review and modified some text to clarify in the PDT. The link is below: Please let me know if you have any comments/questions on the updated text. Thanks. Best, Namyeong 김나명 | Namyeong Kim Research Engineer | IoT Connectivity Standard Task | C&M Standard Lab. of CTO Future Technology Center | LG Electronics E-mail: namyeong.kim@lge.com | Mobile: +82-10-7377-3624 From: Namyeong Kim [mailto:namyeong.kim@xxxxxxx] Hi, Mark. Thanks for your kind comments. I added my comments in the document. Please see the attached document. Also, I’ll share an updated PDT document (1667r2) including you and other members comments soon. Thanks. Best, Namyeong. From: Mark Rison [mailto:m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx] Thanks for this PDT, Namyeong. I attach some comments. I'm not sure it's worth trying to finalise the exact text until we've first agreed on which option(s) to adopt. Note that I haven't marked every repeated instance of certain issues (e.g. missing article). Thanks, Mark From: Namyeong Kim <namyeong.kim@xxxxxxx> Hi Edward, Rojan. Thanks for your comments. I’ll add some text of section 9.4.2.247b.3 Probe Request variant Multi-Link element into the next revision. Maybe the text is for option 2 only. Thanks. Best, Namyeong. From: Edward Au [mailto:edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx] Hello Namyeong, On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 3:26 AM Namyeong Kim <namyeong.kim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |
Attachment:
11-20-1667-03-00be-pdt-mac-mlo-discovery-information-request - LC - NMK.....docx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document