Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Tomo, Thanks for sharing your opinion. I more prefer “an
MLD for which all link pairs are STR”, but don’t have a strong opinion. Main reason is it will not change from NSTR MLD to STR MLD (or vice versa, from STR MLD
to NSTR MLD) due to the enable or disable of some of the links. We can see other people’s opinion. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Yunbo,
Which one will you take? The first one, i.e.,
“an MLD for
which all link pairs are STR”? With the enabled and disabled links existing, I would prefer the second one, i.e.,
“an MLD for
which all enabled link pairs are STR”.
Best regards, tomo From: Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Matt, Thanks for the suggestion. It is more cleaner. If no comments from other person, I will update it in next revision. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Matthew Fischer [mailto:matthew.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Yunbo, Suggested improved wording: Change: an MLD with all of its link pairs of the associated links are STR to: an MLD for which all link pairs are STR and for the other option: an MLD for which all enabled link pairs are STR Matthew Fischer Nice Guy Broadcom Inc. +1 408 543 3370 office On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 9:15 AM Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |