Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT for Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format

Hi Yujin,

Two comments to Table 36-x2 in the PDT:
1. For the OFDMA case, do you need to refer to the 4-bit bitmap (B3-B6 of U-SIG-1) to be more specific?

2. Is there a need to split each CBW into the nonpunctured case and punctured case? Note that the non-OFDMA case includes the nonpunctured pattern. In the next spec draft which will incorporate resolved CIDs in the U-SIG subclause, the pattern '1111' would be added to the OFDMA case as well. So, the nonpunctured case is just a special case to the general _expression_ of the punctured pattern.

Best regards,
Alice Chen
Qualcomm



On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 12:40 PM Yujin Noh <Yujin.Noh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Attached please find the PDT for Effect of CH_BANDWIDTH parameter on PPDU format.

 

Based on the discussion last teleconference call, all the puncturing patterns for both non-OFDMA and OFDMA are included in INACTIVE_SUBCHANNELS parameter.

With this PDT to be approved, then one CID linked to this document would be ready.

 

Let me know if you have any comments and questions.

 

Regards,

Yujin

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1