Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT - Unused tone EVM

Hi Xiaogang,

 

Thanks for sharing opinion.

 

Agree that relying on EVM itself may violate regulatory domain requirement, e.g. ETSI.

 

Do you support option 1, only punctured mask?

 

Best regards,

Wook Bong Lee

 

From: Chen, Xiaogang C [mailto:xiaogang.c.chen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 8:57 AM
To: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT - Unused tone EVM

 

Thanks Wook Bong to initiate this.

One thing to consider is regulatory may not differentiate puncture and unallocated. They only differentiate adjacent and non-adjacent subchannel.

Given that, regarding the unused EVM of the frequency portion of the “hole”,  fully rely on e or e-2 may violate the regulatory requirement (for low MCS) if the interpretation of the unused “hole” is just “non-adjacent”. So IMO puncture mask is safer for the “hole”.

 

 

BRs,

Xiaogang.

 

From: Wook Bong Lee <wookbong.lee@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 4:47 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] PDT - Unused tone EVM

 

Hi all,

 

Thanks for discussion today.

Please give your opinion on  

11-21/639r1, Proposed Resolution of Remaining TBDs in 36.3.19.4.4 and 36.3.20.3, Wook Bong Lee (Samsung)

 

Please focus on change #3. PHY group accepted change #1, 2 and 4 today.

 

Best regards,

Wook Bong Lee

 

From: Wook Bong Lee
Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 8:36 AM
To: 'asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx' <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Sigurd Schelstraete <sschelstraete@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tianyu Wu <tianyu@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Announcement: Motions for TGbe on Wednesday 14th of April 2021

 

Hi Alfred, Sigurd and Tianyu,

 

Can you please add following in the PHY queue?

11-21/639, Proposed Resolution of Remaining TBDs in 36.3.19.4.4 and 36.3.20.3, Wook Bong Lee (Samsung)

 

I will upload today or next Monday morning.

 

Best regards,

Wook Bong Lee

 

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 7:06 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Announcement: Motions for TGbe on Wednesday 14th of April 2021

 

Hello all,

This is an advanced notification that TGbe will run motions during the Joint teleconference scheduled on April 14th 2021.

Please refer to the document linked below for a preliminary list of all the motions (starting from slide 33)  that will be run during the conference call:


Please review the documents included in Motions 166-172, and reply to this e-mail if you would like to identify any of these documents or any particular CID as items that need further discussion. 

The deadline for sending these e-mails is April 13th  2021 @10:00am ET.


A list of these requested items will be queued for discussion and run as a separate motion (Motions >172) during the same Joint conference call.
Contributions that have not received a request for further discussions will be part of their respective cumulative motion and will be run at the same Joint conference call. 
For more information please refer to the subclause "Guideline-Building Consensus and Populating the TGbe SFD" in https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/20/11-20-0984-04-00be-tgbe-teleconference-guidelines.docx.


If you have any comments and/or questions please let me know.
Best Regards,
Alfred

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1