| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
We have updated the version based on the comments that were received during last call.
Alfred: Please add this to the MAC agenda.
Regards, From: Tomo Adachi <tomo.adachi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Hello Subir,
My thinking is that when the device is an MLD, sure it can do the NSEP priority access negotiation at MLD level.
However, it doesn’t always need to be between MLDs.
And the access is indeed in per STA level, so there’s no reason to exclude the priority access.
Best regards, tomo From: Das, Subir <sdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hello MAC participants, Please use this thread to express your thoughts/opinion on the following: In EHT, NSEP priority access negotiation (action frame exchange) should be at MLD level and the priority access for medium should be per STA level.
With this approach, the negotiation process will be efficient since it requires a single request/teardown exchange on one link to enable priority for all links. In addition, scenarios where priority is really
required and it would only be desired on some subset of links seem rare. On the latter, medium access is a per-link activity, so priority in resource allocation must occur at the per-STA level.
Thanks, _Subir To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |