Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Updated CR on preamble puncturing

Hi folks,

 

Based on suggestion from Shimi today, I’m made the following editorial update (i.e., move the “if statement” to the front):

In an EHT MU PPDU or a non-HT duplicate PPDU, an EHT AP may puncture other subchannels in addition to those indicated in the Disabled Subchannel Bitmap field in the EHT Operation element. In this case, the EHT AP shall assign an RU or MRU within the nonpunctured subchannel set to a responding EHT STA using a triggering frame if the EHT AP intends to solicit a response. In this case of additional puncturing, if the EHT AP intends to solicit a response, the EHT AP shall assign an RU or MRU within the nonpunctured subchannel set to a responding EHT STA using a triggering frame.

 

As there was no other comment received, I’ve upload the above change to 21/0455r9 tagged with R9 in comments.

 

Thanks,

Yanjun

 

From: Yanjun Sun <yanjuns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:06 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Updated CR on preamble puncturing

 

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

Hi Alfred,

 

Base on offline inputs, I made some editorial changes in the last paragraph on page 9 to clarify the behavior of punctured non-HT duplicate PPDU transmission. Could we discuss this briefly before running the motion during the joint call?

 

The updated CR is at https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0455-08-00be-cr-for-35-2-1-2-preamble-puncturing.docx and please let me know if you have any additional comments/suggestions.

 

Thanks,

Yanjun

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1