Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Mark,

Yes, adding it to your 21/1111 sounds good to me. I think that would be a good clarification.

Thanks,

Duncan

From: mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 4:57 PM
To: Duncan Ho <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

By the way, we could add this to document 11-21/1111, if you are worried about touching 11-21/0577 since it has already passed straw poll.

Mark

From: mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2021 5:49 PM
To: 'Duncan Ho' <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Ming/Duncan,

Should we add a statement that the Block Ack agreement is between the peer MLDs, the scoreboarding function that is in the Lower MAC sublayer is just a “link local” optimization that may provide partial information about block ack status? That is, it is not where the overall block ack agreement is negotiated or maintained.

Mark

From: Duncan Ho <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 12:07 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Hi Ming,

The diagram and associated text made no such requirement/assumption since they are meant for describing the functions and not how the detailed parameters are set or negotiated, etc.

Thanks,

Duncan

From: Ganming(Ming Gan) <ming.gan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2021 7:33 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.

Hello Duncan

I have a general question about the figure. Does it imply the size of each scoreboard for each link needs negotiation during ADDBA request/response?

Best wishes

Ming Gan

发件人: 顾祥新 (Xiangxin Gu) [mailto:Xiangxin.Gu@xxxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年5月10日 17:04
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Hi Duncan,

Thank you for the contribution!

I think we can have a more general example in Figure 35-xxx – Example MLD and the affiliated STA communication system, such as 2 STAs in non-AP MLD setting up link1 and link3 with AP MLD which has 3 STAs.

BR,

Xiangxin

Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd.

+86 21 20360600 3324

From: Arik Klein <arik.klein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 5:15 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Now with the doc…

Sorry.

Regards,

Arik

From: Arik Klein
Sent: יום ה 06 מאי 2021 12:12
To: 'Duncan Ho' <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Hi Duncan,

Thanks for sharing this document.

I’ve attach my comments with my colleague (Stephen McCann) comments.

I’ll appreciate your review for these comments.

Regards,

Arik

From: Duncan Ho <dho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: יום ד 28 אפריל 2021 21:00
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Feedback Requested for CRs related to MLD architecture - 11-21-0577

Hi all,

Please see https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0577-00-00be-cr-mld-architecture.docx and let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Thanks,

Duncan

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1