Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答���: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for MAC submissions

Hi Yongho,

 

Thanks for the good comment. I agree with you. The case that the MLD can stop transmission on both links is missed.

 

The highlight sentence try to cover the cases that already allowed by current spec. I think a simple way is to remove this sentence. Let’s see whether people have different opinions, if no other opinion received I will remove it in the next revision.

 

 

Regards,

Yunbo

 

发件人: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年7月15日 13:25
收件人: Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>
抄送: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for MAC submissions

 

Hi Yunbo, 

 

In the following paragraph, 

After two PPDUs with end time alignment (and the PPDUs carrying the expected response frames also have end time alignment) are transmitted by an MLD on two links that belongs to a NSTR link pair of this MLD, if the MLD intend to transmit following PPDUs on both links when failure happens on at least one of the two links, the MLD conduct the procedures in this sub-clause. Otherwise, the MLD stops transmission on a link that failure happens and continue to do multiple frame transmission on anther link, as described in 10.23.2.8(Multiple frame transmission in an EDCA TXOP).

 

The  highlighted new sentence does not cover all possible scenarios. For example, the MLD may stop current TXOP and resume the EDCA channel access on both links. I suggest either removing the highlighted sentence or listing all cases. 

 

Thanks, 

Yongho 

 

2021년 7월 14일 (수) 오후 5:52, Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:

Hi Alfred,

 

Would you please add a SP for doc 21/826r4 in the MAC agenda?

 

 

@ All,

Base on offline discussion with Chunyu, two changes in r4 compare with r3 (marked in grey), please review.

1)       Modify the text to avoid the use of the name “IFS larger than SIFS”. So that we don’t need introduce another new type of IFS in subclause 10.3.2.3 (IFS).

2)       Add the clarification that only if the MLD intends to transmit to the same destination over two links after error occurs over one link, the MLD conduct this error recover procedure. Otherwise, the MLD should initiate normal backoff procedure.

 

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-0826-04-00be-pdt-for-error-recovery-of-nstr-mld.docx

 

 

Regards,

Yunbo

 

发件人: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2021年7月15日 0:18
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for MAC submissions

 

Hello all,

 

The current MAC queue for CC34 contains several submissions that are deferred/presented but with no request to be added to the agenda. 

 

If you plan to run a SP or present tomorrow a CR document for CC34 please let me know. I need to know which of these submissions are ready to be presented so that i can prepare the agenda for tomorrow's MAC call.

 

Please do so by today 20:00 ET. 

 

Regards,


Alfred

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1