| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear all, Due to time limitation, there is no Q&A for the SP of 21/0826r6 in last MAC call. The person who vote No, would you please share your concerns or
comments to me through e-mail? Thanks a lot! Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Liyunbo
Hi Yongho, Thanks for the good comment. I agree with you. The case that the MLD can stop transmission on both links is missed. The highlight sentence try to cover the cases that already allowed by current spec. I think a simple way is to remove this sentence. Let’s see whether
people have different opinions, if no other opinion received I will remove it in the next revision. Regards, Yunbo 发件人: Yongho Seok [mailto:yongho.seok@xxxxxxxxx]
Hi Yunbo, In the following paragraph, After two PPDUs with end time alignment (and the PPDUs carrying the expected response frames also have end time alignment) are transmitted by an MLD on two links that belongs to a NSTR link pair of this MLD, if the MLD
intend to transmit following PPDUs on both links when failure happens on at least one of the two links, the MLD conduct the procedures in this sub-clause.
Otherwise, the MLD stops transmission on a link that failure happens and continue to do multiple frame transmission on anther link, as described in 10.23.2.8(Multiple frame transmission in an EDCA TXOP). The highlighted new sentence does not cover all possible scenarios. For example, the MLD may stop current TXOP and resume the EDCA channel access on both links. I suggest either removing the highlighted sentence or listing
all cases. Thanks, Yongho 2021년 7월 14일 (수)
오후 5:52, Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |