Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Mengshi, Got it. Thanks! BR, Xiangxin Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. +86 21 20360600 3324 From: humengshi <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx> Hi Xiangxin, I think in Page 101 Line 34 (D1.1) we already have the following description: Thus now an EHT AP will not have a 1 0 0 configuration (the 5th row of the table 9-29g1 in D1.1). Best regards, Mengshi Hu Huawei 发件人:
顾祥新 (Xiangxin Gu) [mailto:Xiangxin.Gu@xxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Yanjun, Thanks for the contribution! For the change under 35.4.1.1.1, HE variant User Info field with B54 and B55 and B39 which are equal to 1 and 0 and 0 respectively is excluded. Is there any reason
to do so?
35.4.1.1.1
Allowed
settings of
the Trigger
frame fields
and TRS
Control subfield TGbe editor: Please update the 3rd paragraph in subclause 35.4.1.1.2 as follows
If the dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true, then an EHT AP shall not transmit a Trigger frame that solicits both an HE TB PPDU and an EHT TB PPDU.
The EHT AP shall not transmit a Trigger frame that contains a User Info field whose AID12 subfield is equal to 0 or 2045 unless both B54 and B55 in the Common Info field of the Trigger frame are equal to
1. (#5201)(#5203)(#5109)(#5118) BR, Xiangxin Unisoc Technologies Co., Ltd. +86 21 20360600 3324 From: Yanjun Sun <yanjuns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi folks, Based on inputs from Xiaofei and Rojan, I’ve marked RA-RU Information subfield as reserved instead of deleting it from the EHT variant User Info field for R1. For folks whose have reviewed the previous version
of this CR, the STA behaviors remain the same as in the previous version. The changes are tagged with “R1”. Please let me know if you have additional comments/suggestions. Thanks, Yanjun From: Yanjun Sun <yanjuns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Alfred and all, Could you help add
21/1282 (CR on RA-RU) to the joint queue? Many thanks to the volunteers and commenters in the author list who provided early feedbacks! Please let me know if you have any comments/suggestions. Thanks, Yanjun To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |