Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 6998

Alice, thanks for your answer in another email.

Shimi, thanks for your prompt response. I am fine with the latest revision. However, I have one minor comment:

There is no need to mention "implementation-specific". Using “should” is sufficient to indicate it is implementation dependent. So the last sentence can be further shortened as follows: The MSB of the Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield should be set to 0 if dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true.

 

Best,

Zinan

 

 

 

From: Shimi Shilo (TRC) <Shimi.Shilo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 4:03 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 6998

 

Hi Zinan and Alice,

 

Thanks for the suggestions.

How about the following updated (and shortened) text?

 

An EHT AP that includes the Special User Info field in a Trigger frame shall set all bits of the Disregard In U-SIG-1 subfield and the four LSBs of the Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield  to 1, if dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true. The MSB of the Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield is implementation-specific and should be set to 0 if dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true.

 

Best regards,

 

Shimi

 

From: Alice Jialing Li Chen [mailto:jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, November 8, 2021 8:38 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 6998

 

Hi Shimi, Zinan,

 

We'd better use the subfield names "Disregard In U-SIG-1 subfield" and "Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield" since they are defined. In Shimi's original proposed text, it would be clear to simply change "all but the last bit" to e.g., "the four LSB bits".

 

Thanks,

Alice

Qualcomm

 

 

 

On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 8:02 AM Zinan Lin <Zinan.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Shimi,

 

Thanks for presenting 11-21/1473r2 in the last PHY meeting. I think the current text (proposed solution for CID 6998) is unclear and may cause some confusion. Therefore, I would suggest to change the following text from

 

“An EHT AP that includes the Special User Info field in a Trigger frame shall set all bits of the Disregard In U-SIG-1 subfield (B25-B30 of the Special User Info field) and all but the last bit of the Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield (B32-B35 of the Special User Info field) to 1, if dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true. The last bit of the Disregard In U-SIG-2 subfield (B36 of the Special User Info field) is implementation-specific and should be set to 0 if dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly is equal to true.”

 

to

 

“In a transmitted Trigger frame including the Special User Info field, an EHT AP with dot11EHTBaseLineFeaturesImplementedOnly being true should set B36 of the Special User Info field to 0, and shall set each bit of B25-B30 and B32-B35 of the Special User Info field to 1.”

 

Please let me know if you have any comments.

 

Thanks,

Zinan

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1