Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802

Hi, Kiseon:

The revised text is only baseline. The negative case is where the exception is intended to be made. Let me think if there is any alternative to make the wording better. So far I haven’t seen a better alternative but I will think more and open for suggestion. 

Thanks. 
Chunyu 

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:54 PM Kiseon Ryu <kryu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Chunyu,
Thanks for your quick response. 
If that's the case, I think it would be more clear to be described as a positive sentence rather than a negative one as below.
⎯ If the r-TWT scheduled STA is not a member of any broadcast TWT schedules that are not restricted TWT schedules, it is not required to be in the awake state at the start times of such broadcast TWT SPs.

Regards,
Kiseon
From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 5:58 PM
To: Kiseon Ryu <kryu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802
 
Hi, Kiseon:

The case you are asking is covered in the second "If ..." bullet.
However, removing the text in red is not equivalent to the sum of the two cases.
First it contradicts that the r-TWT schedule STA can be a member of a r-TWT schedule and we don't want to exclude this case. We would need to change "any" to "a".
But that won't work as it contradicts to the baseline behavior we still want the r-TWT STA to follow where it is member of a non rTWT broadcast TWT schedule, it would be still required to wake up at the start times of a different non rTWT broadcast TWT schedule.

As such, it's best to list these two cases as in current text.

Thanks.
Chunyu

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 2:23 PM Kiseon Ryu <kryu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Chunyu,

Thank you for sharing your CR document. I have one question about the following sentence in your document. 
⎯ If the r-TWT scheduled STA is not a member of any broadcast TWT schedules that are not restricted TWT schedules, it is not required to be in the awake state at the start times of such broadcast TWT SPs.

What about the case of "that are restricted TWT schedules" above? If the scheduled STA is not member of the restricted TWT schedules, is it required to be in the awake state at the TWT SPs or not? If not, we can delete the red text. What do you think?

Thank you,
Kiseon

From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2021 2:04 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802
 
Hi, all:

I have uploaded a CR document below

The covered CIDs are:

4121, 4719,  4767, 4775, 4779, 4780, 5348, 5728, 5775, 5887, 7471


Please review and share your comments in the thread or to me.


Thank you and happy holidays!

Chunyu


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1