Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802

Hi Chunyu,

 

Thanks for sharing the next revision of the doc1802. I have some comments on this revision:

  • Why are you defining r-TWT TID ? Is there a different mapping with classical TIDs ? If no, I think that it creates some misunderstandings.
  • About CID5664, I think that you don’t answer to the comment that asks additional mechanisms for controlling the data flows sent by the STAs during the rTWT SP. It means some penalties if STAs don’t respect the deal with the AP.
  • On p.5 l.28, a NOTE enables the scheduling AP to solicit any STAs that is not registered to the corresponding rTWT.  To ensure fairness among all STAs, it is preferable to tear down the rTWT SP if no data from registered STAs remain to be transmitted.

 

Regards

 

Patrice

 

From: Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: samedi 4 décembre 2021 00:10
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Call for review of restricted TWT CR doc 11-21/1802

 

Hi, all:

 

I have taken into feedback and offline discussion into account and uploaded the latest revision as r1 at:

 

Please continue to share any thoughts/feedback you may have.

Thanks.

Chunyu



On Nov 25, 2021, at 11:04 AM, Chunyu Hu <chunyuhu07@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Hi, all:

 

I have uploaded a CR document below

 

The covered CIDs are:

4121, 4719,  4767, 4775, 4779, 4780, 5348, 5728, 5775, 5887, 7471

 

Please review and share your comments in the thread or to me.

 

Thank you and happy holidays!

Chunyu

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1