Hi
Jinyoung,
Thank you for the revisions. I think the direction is good. Though it is not really clearly a normative behavior.
How about change the sentence into:
“ An EHT beamformer that has initiated an EHT TB sounding sequence shall transmit a BFRP trigger to solicit feedback and may send
another more than one BFRP Trigger frame in the same TXOP.”
Best regards,
Xiaofei Clement Wang
Principal Engineer | InterDigital
T: (631) 622.4028
From:
천진영 <jiny.chun@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:00 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] BFRP discussion
|
|
Hi,
Yesterday, I’ve presented 21/2013 (CRs for 35.5.3) and members want more discussion by email. So I make this email thread.
The addressed issue is that:
Currently, the same STA can’t be re-polled but the other STAs can be polled by additional BFRP Trigger in the same TXOP.
So the current figure has some problem.
So I’d like to remove the word
‘One or more sequences’ and make some changes the BFRP explanation as below.
BFRP Trigger frames sent within an EHT TB sounding sequence shall solicit EHT TB PPDUs. (move from other place)
An EHT beamformer that has initiated an EHT TB sounding sequence may send
another more than one BFRP Trigger frame in the same TXOP as shown in Figure 35-29 (An illustration of EHT TB sounding).
Please give me your opinions or good directions for the CR.
Best regards,
Jinyoung
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1