Hello Po-kai
I think that is clear to the group from technical aspect. You run one sp for PMF, the result is
36Y:27N, and then run another SP for the remaining part, including cross link individual addressed frame transmission, the result is
41Y: 32 N.
Meanwhile, we still have more than 1000 unresolved CIDs and the agenda of joint meeting is much full. Could we leave time to those unresolved CIDS given you just used your opportunity
to present your contribution and run the SP recently? At least we should give them opportunity to present before draft 2.0.
By the way, I also presented some controversial proposals recently, but I did not ask for motion following gentleman rule.
Best wishes
Ming Gan
发件人: Huang, Po-kai [mailto:po-kai.huang@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2022年3月14日
13:14
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] TGbe Joint on Monday 14th March: Announcement
Hi Ming,
Thanks for the feedback. I think during the SP people are confusing on many parts that are inserted into the document at the same time (PMF and TWT stuff at the end).
I have removed those confusing parts and focus the documents on the main proposal, which is the indication in framebody for intended link of MMPDU.
The option for indication in framebody is the favorable option vs A3 indication (58 (Y)/21 (N)).
Best,
Po-Kai
Hello Po-kai
I remembered this sp was run on Thursday MAC adhoc meeting, the SP result is 41(Y): 32 (N). Why did you ask motion for it directly? Is there any technical change on your document?
I observed there is only editorial fix. Although motion is allowed, I still hope people respect gentleman rule and save time (we don’t like to have frequent meeting for this kind of unnecessary debate, we should use this time to address as many CIDs as possible).
In this case, I will vote N against this motion given that the controversial part is not addressed.
Best wishes
Ming Gan
Hi Alfred,
I have done offline discussion to remove the part in 11-21/1877 that people have issue and have done some editorial edition.
Could you also include 11-21/1877r8 to the motion list of Monday joint session?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Best,
Po-Kai
Hi Alfred,
I did further offline discussion, I want to run the motion for 11-22/75r3. Could you include this to the motion list of Monday joint session?
Thanks,
Yongho
Hello all,
We have the last Joint conference call of the electronic plenary for TGbe scheduled on Monday 14 March at 09:00am ET.
Preliminary agenda can be found
here
I would like to ask members for the following:
1) Please remember that daylight saving time starts on Sunday 13th of March.
2) A preliminary list of motions for the Monday call is uploaded in the server. Doc:
1982r63.
-
Please check the CIDs and revision numbers of the documents in the Motions 315-319 and if there is any of these documents that need to be separated out
(please do so by EOB Sunday (ET).
-
Please let me know if there is any other motions that need to be made
(please do so by EOB Sunday (ET).
3) Please let me know if you have any submission that resolves CIDs in the Joint tab. And eventually others that we may cover if time permits.
--
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1