| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| 
 Thanks Zinan. We have the same understanding. The discussion part was saying the current assumption that receiver is non-AP STA (the way current spec text was written) is not accurate so there are some proposed text changes in the document. BRs, Xiaogang. From: Zinan Lin <Zinan.Lin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  Hi Xiaogang, Thanks for presenting 11-22/0476r1. I have one question on the document. It is written in the document 11-22/0476r1: 
 However, the specs texts above Table 36-40 (802.11be D1.4) indicates 
 Above sentence does not specify non-MU-MIMO allocation is for DL only. Instead,  Table 36-29 in 802.11be D1.4 shows UL has UL OFDMA or UL non-OFDMA (including non-MU-MIMO and MU-MIMO).
 Therefore, I am wondering why the discussion in 0476r1 assumes the receiver is a non-AP STA in Table 36-40. Do I miss anything? 
 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1  |