Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Thomas/all, I bit of background/status from ARC, since you asked. 😊 ARC did discuss what we believe is the model for an AP MLD when communicating with a “legacy” (non-EHT) non-AP STA. The results can be found in 11-21/1111r9. Note that after off-line discussions with TGbe members that asked to be included in this topic, I have updated to 11-21/1111r10 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/21/11-21-1111-10-00be-mld-architecture-part-2.docx), and this is still ongoing (no consensus, yet, and no review by TGbe, yet). However, the point you’re asking: what is the structure for the upper MAC sublayer when interacting with a non-EHT non-AP STA, I think there is agreement on the general approach (someone will jump in and correct me if I’m wrong about that, I’m sure). A new figure, 4-30c is introduced, which shows that there are parallel upper MAC sublayers which handle such associations/communications, and form the upper part of the affiliated APs. A new Figure 7-2 shows the relationship to the DS (and thereby the ESS) and the SAPs. Note that the MLD AP and the affiliated APs all share the same DS, and thus the same ESS, and thus the same SSID. Mark From: Thomas Derham <00000ad2eabc2931-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> It’s clear to me from subclause 4.9.5 that an MLD has a single MAC SAP, and therefore interfaces with a single DS. Therefore, following the logic that Abhi explains, a given AP MLD has a single SSID. What is perhaps less clear (not sure if it came up in the ARC discussions?) is the model for when an AP MLD (or just the APs?) interacts with non-EHT non-AP STAs. For example, when an HE non-AP STA associates with a EHT AP, it’s not obvious (to me) from the reference diagrams whether the “MLD Upper MAC sublayer” (figure 4-30b and figure 5-2a) assumes the functionality of the “upper part” of a “regular” AP (i.e. everything above “Duplicate Detection” in figure 5-1), or whether the EHT AP actually has a parallel “upper” stack for handling non-MLD / non-EHT STAs. If the former, then clearly the same MAC-SAP is used for all non-AP MLDs and non-AP STAs, so the same SSID applies to all of them. If the latter, then theoretically the non-EHT STAs could access a different MAC-SAP compared to the EHT non-AP MLDs, and so I suppose in theory the SSID could be different too, although I don’t think the rest of the MLO design anticipates that possibility. Thanks Thomas On Mar 20, 2022 at 7:50:25 PM, Rojan Chitrakar <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |