Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion on 1793 TID Mapping Enhancements

Thank you for your comments Xiangxin , let me try to provide some answers:
1) I agree with you on this point, however please note that for non-MLD/legacy STAs that AP would be gone and we need an MLME.STOP that applies only to these STAs.
2) We have also considered a unique reason code, but other members indicated preferrence for per-link reasons. I do agree with you that when only one action is happening then one reason code does suffice. 
3) Thanks, I will share with the other authors
4) There is a critical difference with the affiliated AP removal procedure, which is preservation of state for STAs that are affiliated with MLDs, so the same exact procedure can't be applied here. 


Best
Pooya 

On Tuesday, April 26, 2022, 01:32:40 AM PDT, 顾祥新 (Xiangxin Gu) <xiangxin.gu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


Hi Pooya,

 

Thank you for the contribution. I agree the document in principle, with following suggestions.

 

1)      Association is at MLD level. So preserving MLD association is not needed for stopping a BSS of an AP affiliated with an MLD.

2)      It is enough for the Reason Code subfield to be per TID-To-Link Mapping. No needs to make it per link. The detail reason can be inferred from the change of the TID-To-Link Mapping and the Reason code and the ML Load.

3)      The Priority subfield in TID-To-Link Mapping Control field is similar to TWT Setup Command subfield. Suggest to rename it to Command subfield. Value 0 for suggest TID-To-Link Mapping and Value 1 for dictate TID-To-Link Mapping.

4)      Temporarily prohibiting frame exchange on a link is not applicable for legacy STAs. Maybe this can be implemented by removing affiliated AP procedure. If so, the Mapping Switch Count subfield and the Duration are not needed because the information has been provided in adding or removing affiliated AP procedures.

 

BR,

 

Xiangxin Gu

Communication Standards Devision

 

 

From: Pooya Monajemi <00000ef0b9e0aff7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 8:17 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Discussion on 1793 TID Mapping Enhancements

 

Hello all, 

Opening this thread to discuss 1793, please reply with your comments

 

Many thanks

Pooya 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1