Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Updated Motion Deck Uploaded

Hi Rubayet,

As I commented during the call, it is better to use the link that is already exchanging frames between the AP MLD and the non-AP MLD instead of switching to the other link where the r-TWT is scheduled and start all over again. Since the non-AP MLD is a single-radio MLD and it can use only one link at a time for frame exchanges across the EMLSR links, I don't think different TIDs will be mapped to different links (in a disjoint way). Also I don't quite understand the need for the RLS control signaling. 

I would be happy to discuss with you on these topics but I don't think we can reach consensus during this week so I'm suggesting to defer to the next round.

Regards,
Minyoung 

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:58 PM Rubayet Shafin <r.shafin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Minyoung,


I tried to respond to your EMLSR questions during the call. Do you have any additional questions or are you not satisfied with the response? Could you kindly share your concerns?


Best

Rubayet

From: Minyoung Park <mpark.ieee@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 3:55:03 PM
To: Rubayet Shafin
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Updated Motion Deck Uploaded
 
Hi Rubayet,

I still have concerns on the doc 254r3 regarding the text for EMLSR and r-TWT. I would suggest to defer this discussion to the next round.

Regards,
Minyoung

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:42 PM Rubayet Shafin <r.shafin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

 

I presented document 11-22/254r3 last Thursday. Since then we have had some offline discussion with other members to discuss some issues. Could you kindly add the document in the MAC queue for tomorrow for SP running?

 

Thanks you for your help.

 

Best

Rubayet

 

From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 5:21 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Updated Motion Deck Uploaded

 

Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Please use this version of the agenda. I had forgotten to add doc 11111r15 in the previous revision.

 

Regards,

 

Alfred

 

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 3:11 PM Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello all, 

 

I uploaded a revised version of the motion deck here.

As of now, accounting for all documents in the queues (latest version here) and the proposed motions listed for tomorrow we should have all CIDs accounted in some document and pending resolution/discussion. 

 

Please take a look at the agendas, and motions list and let me know if there is anything missing or if you have any suggestions for modifications/rearrangements. 

 

Regards,

 

Alfred

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302


 

--

Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD

IEEE802.11 TGbe Chair,

Qualcomm Technologies Inc.

Cell #:    +1 858 263 9445

Office #: +1 858 658 5302

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1