Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Abhi, Thanks for initiating this. I second explicit call out forms as well. Regards, Rojan From: Arik Klein <0000177967a59511-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Abhi, I agree with your point and support the explicit call out forms:
This clearly avoid any misunderstandings / ambiguity. Regards, Arik From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All, I’d like to follow up on the topic we discussed during today’s TGbe MAC call (‘STA’ vs ‘non-AP STA’).
There were different opinions on the topic. I personally like explicitly calling out “non-AP STA affiliated with a non-AP MLD”. I know it is a bit lengthy but it align with the definition of a non-AP MLD and avoid any ambiguity
(as pointed out by the two comments). “non-access point (non-AP) multi-link device (MLD):
An MLD, where each station (STA) affiliated with the MLD
is a non-AP STA.”
I’d like to hear more thoughts on this item and hopefully conclude before the next TGbe MAC call (Monday 15th Aug) so that we can resolve the two comments during that call. Regards, To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |