Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Vishnu, Thanks for the contribution document 22/1335r0, I have concerns: 1)
With this mechanism, the AP MLD get easier to operating with EMLSR/EMLMR mode. So it is unreasonable to have a capability item on this. 2)
The solution doesn’t cover the case that there is no services running over group addressed frames at non-AP MLD side. 3)
It’s better to put the information in EML Operating Notification frame, which consumes less steps and less signal overhead. I don’t think it’s a good idea
to utilize an inefficient way just because we want to cover NSTR case. Actually no CID is related to NSTR. We can have a separate discussion on NSTR. From: Vishnu Ratnam <vishnu.r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Alfred, Could you kindly add the following document to the MAC queue. It resolves 13 CIDs.
In addition, I have uploaded the 1201r1 which is a PDT (in place of 1201r0 which was a ppt). As discussed, could you kindly move that document to the MAC Comment
Resolution queue from the contribution queue? It resolves 1 CID.
Thanking you, Vishnu From: Edward Au <edward.ks.au@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear Alfred and all, Revision 16 of the comment spreadsheet is posted: This version updated the status of selected CIDs after the motions on Wednesday, together with a few TTT assignments and PoC reassignment. Regards, To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |