Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Hi Abhi,

Thanks for the update.

Noticed that there seem to be duplicated normative texts between baseline clause and clause 35 as highlighted below. I believe the intention is to capture non-MLD case in clause 10.25 but since EHT STAs could also be affiliated with MLDs, suggest to modify all occurrences of “EHT STAs” in clause 10.25 as “EHT STAs not affiliated with an MLD” or use “non-MLO” qualifier.

Btw, the first part in 10.25 should also mention BA agreement between two EHT STAs.

When a block ack agreement is established between two HT STAs, two DMG STAs, or two S1G STAs, or two EHT STAs not affiliated with an MLD, the originator may change the size of its transmission window (WinSize_O) such that

10.25 Block acknowledgment (block ack)

10346]When a block ack agreement is established between two HT STAs, two DMG STAs, or two S1G STAs, the originator may change the size of its transmission window (WinSize_O) such that:

— The transmission window (WinSize_O) is not greater than the value in the Buffer Size field of the ADDBA Response frame if either STA is a non-EHT STA.

— The transmission window is not greater than the buffer size indicated in the ADDBA Response frame if both STAs are EHT STAs.

— The transmission window is not greater than 64 if the sender or receiver of the ADDBA Response frame is a non-HE STA.

— The transmission window is not greater than 256 if the sender and receiver of the ADDBA Response frame are HE STAs.

— The transmission window is not greater than 1024 if the sender and receiver of the ADDBA Response frame are EHT STAs.

[10346]If the value in the Buffer Size field of the ADDBA Response frame is smaller than the value in the ADDBA Request frame, the originator shall change the size of its transmission window (WinSize_O) so that it meets the following conditions:

— Is not greater than the value in the Buffer Size field of the ADDBA Response frame.

— Is not greater than 64 if the sender or receiver of the ADDBA Response frame is a non-HE STA or if the STAs that establish the block ack agreement are HT STAs or DMG STAs that are not EDMG STAs.

— Is not greater than 256 if the sender and receiver of the ADDBA Response frame are HE STAs.

— Is not greater than 1024 if the STAs that establish the block ack agreement are EDMG STAs or EHT STAs.

35.3.8 Block ack procedures in Multi-link operation

[10346]When a block ack agreement is established between two MLDs, the originator may change the size of its transmission window (WinSizeO) so that the transmit window meets the following conditions:

— Is not greater than the buffer size indicated in the ADDBA Response frame.

— Is not greater than 1024 if the sender and receiver of the ADDBA Response frame are MLDs.

[10346]

[10346]If the buffer size indicated ~~based on the Buffer Size field together with the Extended Buffer Size field (if present) of~~ in the ADDBA Response frame is smaller than the buffer size indicated ~~based on the Buffer Size field together with the Extended Buffer Size field (if present) of~~ in the ADDBA Request frame, the originator shall change the size of its transmission window (WinSize_O) such that:

— The transmission window is not greater than the buffer size indicated in the ADDBA Response frame.

— The transmission window is not greater than 1024 if the sender and the receiver of the ADDBA Response frame are MLDs.

Regards,

Rojan

From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2022 4:42 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

Hi Alfred, Liwen, Jeongki,

Qi and I had offline discussion and she is fine with the proposed resolution for the CIDs related to tx window adjustment at the originator.

Could you please help add the following CIDs from doc 11-22/1336r3 for SP:

11374 10346 11371 11372 11613 10349 10350 11612 12446

The resolution is same as what we discussed last week during TGbe MAC ad-hoc.

Regards,
Abhi

From: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2022 8:40 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Alfred, Liwen, Jeongki,

I received offline feedback from Binita and Po-Kai and the result of the discussion has update the resolution for CID 13259.

Can you please help add doc 11-22/1182r11 to the TGbe MAC agenda to re-run the SP for CID 13259?

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/22/11-22-1182-11-00be-lb266-cr-for-ml-ie-rules-part-2.docx

Hi All, the changes for CID 13259 are highlighted in blue. Could you please let me know if you have any suggestions?

Regards,
Abhi

From: Jeongki Kim <jeongki.kim.ieee@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2022 10:06 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Alfred,

Can you add the following CR document into MAC queue?

11-22/1573r0, CR for CID 10911, Jeongki Kim

Thanks,

Jeongki

2022년 9월 9일 (금) 오후 4:02, Vishnu Ratnam <vishnu.r@xxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:

Hi Alfred,

The straw poll for the following document was deferred due to a comment on the call. It has since been resolved via offline discussion. So can you kindly add the following document to the queue for running straw poll?

08-Sep-2022 ET

2022

1355

1

TGbe

AP Link Disablement Notification

Vishnu Ratnam (Samsung)

08-Sep-2022 19:06:21 ET

Download

Regards,

Vishnu

From: 顾祥新 (Xiangxin Gu) <Xiangxin.Gu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 10:44 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Hi Alfred,

I have not gone through document 22/1205r3 yet during the 9/7 AM1 session because of insufficient time.

Would you please assign 10 minutes for it in 9/8 sessions?

BR,

Xiangxin Gu

Communication Standards Devision

From: Morteza Mehrnoush <000012bde833b015-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 9, 2022 1:11 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

Hi Alfred,

Could you please add "11/1369r0, CR for some CIDs on clause-9" to MAC queue?

Thanks,

Morteza

From: Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2022 2:03 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

Hi Alfred, Can you please add 22/1545r0 LB266: CR for CIDs related to TWT Information frame to MAC ad-hoc queue. It resolves 12 CIDs. I will upload the doc to mentor by tomorrow. Thanks, Kumail. On Sep 8, 2022, at 1: 29 PM, Muhammad Kumail Haider

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Alfred,

Can you please add 22/1545r0 LB266: CR for CIDs related to TWT Information frame to MAC ad-hoc queue. It resolves 12 CIDs. I will upload the doc to mentor by tomorrow.

Thanks,

Kumail.

On Sep 8, 2022, at 1:29 PM, Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

Can you please add 22/1280r5 to MAC agenda for running SP on 7 deferred CIDs?

08-Sep-2022 ET

2022

1280

5

TGbe

LB 266: CR for R-TWT related CIDs Part1

Muhammad Kumail Haider (Meta)

Thanks,

Kumail.

On Sep 3, 2022, at 8:57 PM, Muhammad Kumail Haider <kumail.ieee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred,

Can you please queue the following doc to TGbe MAC Ad-hoc agenda?

03-Sep-2022 ET

2022

1463

0

TGbe

LB266: CR for P2P Support in R-TWT

Thanks,

Kumail.

On Sep 2, 2022, at 9:36 PM, Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Alfred, Liwen, Jeongki,

Can you please help add the following two docs to the TGbe MAC agenda?

11-22/1336 (~20 CIDs) - LB266: Resolution for comments related to MLO BA operation

11-22/1422 (~14 CIDs) - LB266: Resolution for comments related to various aspects of MLO

Regards,

Abhi

From: Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 9:23 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Requesting agenda time on MAC ad-hoc

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Alfred,

Please add the following CR documents to the MAC queue:

11-22-1189-00-CR-for TXS – part 1
11-22-1188-00-CR for Medium Sync Recovery
11-22-1187-CR for SCS related CIDs

Regards,

Dibakar

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1