Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Arik, Thanks for the feedback. Since you and Yongho have objection on rejecting CID 12604, I am ok to rename the ‘Delete Timer’ field. I wanted to ask you why do you have ‘Expected’ in the field name? Are you ok to calling it ‘Affiliated AP Removal Timer”? Thanks, Binita From: Arik Klein <arik.klein@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Binita, Thanks for your presentation. As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply
asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the content of
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Hi Binita, Thanks for your presentation. As to CID 12604 – Similar to Yongho’s concern, I do not see a real technical reason to reject this comment which simply asking to designate a name for the field that will be adequate to the
content of the field, as specified in the comment. Please consider to revise the comment as proposed. Regards, Arik From: Binita Gupta <00001d96db2c011d-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi All, I presented CR doc 22/1890r1 in today’s TGbe AM1 session.
Following CIDs were deferred. 10567 13480 13759 13762 11042 11401 11520 12604 13263 13264 13481 13760 Please share your comments/feedback on these CIDs in this thread. Thanks, Binita To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1 |