Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 11-22-1418-01-00be-lb266-cr-of-nstr-capability-update

Hi Yunbo,

 

Thank you for the presentation. I repeat my question here which I think wasn’t answered fully.

 

It is not clear to me why do we need a Link Reconfiguration Confirmation frame from the AP MLD for NSTR status change? In other words, why does the non-AP MLD need to know when the AP MLD has started taking into consideration its updated NSTR links? Does this knowledge help or change the non-AP MLD operation in any way?

 

Also some other comments:

  1. “The Link ID subfield specifies a value that uniquely identifies the link that the reported AP is operating on or the link which is indicated for addition or deletion to the existing multi-link setup of a non-AP MLD.” Why the “or deletion”? Isn’t that already covered by the reported AP?
  2. When you have added a “Reconfiguration Operation Type” for NSTR Status update, why do we need a “NSTR Link Pair Present” bit in the STA control field? Will it not always be present in this subtype?

 

Regards,

Vishnu

 

From: Liyunbo <00001846a2e5e0c1-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 11:02 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 11-22-1418-01-00be-lb266-cr-of-nstr-capability-update

 

Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Dear all,

 

I initiate this email thread to collect the opinions about NSTR status update document. Please let me know your comments/suggestions, thanks!

 

 

Regards,

Yunbo

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1