Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Initial Revision of Agendas for Mar'23-May'23 Telcos Uploaded



Hi Ming,

 

I looked at your doc 387 again and I am fine with it now. Since the listen interval request is in the (re)association request frame it is fine that units correspond to the largest requested link’s TBTT. There is also a note clarifying that the value isn’t changed later so it’s clear what is operation after removing a link by the AP.

 

Small suggestion: Maybe change: “The value of the Listen Interval field shall be in units of the maximum value of beacon intervals corresponding to the links that the non-AP MLD intends to setup in the (Re)Association Request frame” to “The value of the Listen Interval field shall be in units of the maximum value of beacon intervals corresponding to the links that the non-AP MLD requests to setup in the (Re)Association Request frame” ?

 

Regards,

Vishnu

 

From: Ganming(Ming Gan) <000017d5b1a95115-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2023 7:48 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE]
答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Initial Revision of Agendas for Mar'23-May'23 Telcos Uploaded

 

Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Hello Alfred

 

23/387 was in Atlanta’s meeting agenda, and wasn’t presented, could you help add it to teleconference’s agenda again, I found this is missing.

 

Best wishes

Ming Gan

 

发件人: Alfred Asterjadhi [mailto:asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2023324 1:36
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] Initial Revision of Agendas for Mar'23-May'23 Telcos Uploaded

 

Hello all,

 

uploaded the telco agendas for the Mar'23-May'23 time period:

 

Please take a look at the submissions list and let me know if any of the contributions are missing from the queues, in particular from PHY queue since we currently have only one submission and based on the guidelines below the plan is to cancel the PHY call of monday if none of the criteria below is satisfied.

 

In addition, please make sure that if you have a deferred CID and intend to request for SP then that submission does appear in the queue as pending SP. This way it does not end up in the quarantine queues/docs. CIDs in quarantine are those that show up in the comment resolution database as "Resolution drafted but no consensus yet" for more than 2 weeks from the day they were presented.

 

Best Regards,


Alfred

 

Guidelines for scheduled PHY conf calls:

  •  Members are invited to send submission requests to be added to the PHY submissions queue.
  • Requests may explicitly indicate if the requestor prefers to discuss his/her submission at a particular PHY conf call. If there is no such explicit indication then the submission will be added by default to the PHY submissions queue and will be scheduled for presentation in a subsequent PHY conference call during which there are at least 3 submissions available for discussion.
  • A scheduled PHY conference call will be cancelled if the planned PHY agenda for that particular conference call does not have at least 3 queued presentations or at least one queued presentation with an explicit request by Thursday 23:59 ET, of the week preceding the scheduled PHY conf call. The cancellation notice will be sent after the deadline passed and no later than Friday EOB of that same week.

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1