Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] CID 18240: elements not carried in a per-STA profile

Thanks Abhi.

What is the scope of this list? I think thereâ??s a large number of elements in 9.4.2 that related to MLD-level features - do we need to include all of them in this list or only elements that are carried in certain frames?

For the example in the CID below, MSCS Descriptor is either carried in (MSCS) action frames or in (Re)Association requests. On the other hand, SCS Descriptor is only carried in (SCS) action frames.

Thanks
Thomas


On May 12, 2023 at 12:12:06 PM, Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi All,

During todayâ??s TGbe MAC ad-hoc (AM2 session), I deferred CID 18240 so that the group could discuss and add any other missing elements that cannot be carried within a Per STA Profile of a reported STA. This email is to solicit the groupâ??s inputs on the topic. Could you please let me know if there are additional elements that you believe need to be listed in clause 35.3.3.4?

18240

Li-Hsiang Sun

35.3.3.4

484.60

MSCS descriptor element should not be included in Per-STA profile subelement b/c (1) it is a MLD level feature. (2) the value should be the same for all links so by inheritance it would not appear in per-STA profile

add MSCS descriptor element to the list of elements not included in the per-STA profile

All STAs affliated with a MLD shall set Mirrored SCS in Extended Capabilities element to the same value

FYI, we can include any missing elements as a resolution to CID 18240.

Regards,
Abhi

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature