Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 24/305--IRM solution for MLD

Hi Carol,


Thanks, I will incorperate all your editorial changes into next revision. Putting non-MLO section here as the baseline is just to show why we have the relevant sentence/rules in MLO subclause . I don't intend to have any text change in non-MLO section. And suppose the change in non-MLO section should be addressed in 11bh group. 




Thanks


Best Regards


Jay Yang (杨志杰)



Original
From: CarolAnsley <carol@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date: 2024年05月08日 05:12
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 24/305--IRM solution for MLD

Hi Jay,

 

Good work on this document.  In the attached I have some suggested changes, mostly editorial cleanup.  For brevity, you may want to delete the copies of the existing non-MLO sections describing Device ID and IRM since you now have no changes in those sections.

 

Regards,

Carol

 

From: Jay Yang <yang.zhijie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, May 6, 2024 at 9:53 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] 24/305--IRM solution for MLD

Hi All,

 

For 24/305, I received new comments from some members to say,  as for the MAC address, the MLD MAC address rather than link MAC address is unique to identify each non-AP MLD .  Based on that, in the latest revision 24/305r5, I change the place of IRM from TA field to ML element. Because some frames, like probe request, public action frame don't include ML element according to 11be baseline. I have to drop the relevent use cases in MLO subclause (Maybe these use case are not very strong in MLO senario ) . That's, non-AP MLD may set IRM in MLD MAC address field in basic ML element in authentication and association frame. 

Besides, I have some offline checked with 11bh group members and the Chair Mark, they confirmed that the Reassocation case is out of 11bh scope, and 11bh group intends to git rid of them after initial SA ballot.  To keep this align with the on-going 11bh draft, I change (Re)association to Association in all occurrences in new subclause .  

This is all the change compared with 305r4 that we are ageed with, Welcome futher comments or thought on this.

 

Hi Alfred, 

 

Could you help put 24/305r5 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-0305-05-00be-cr-for-rcm-relevant-cids.docx  ) to the MAC queue in F2F meeting?

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Best Regards

 

Jay Yang (杨志杰)

 

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1