Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] comments on document IEEE 802.11-22/0079r2



Hi Claudio,

  Thank you for your response. Your suggestion is perfectly fine. I will wait for the sensing session setup TTT.

 

thanks and regards

 

-Anirud

 

Anirudha (Anirud)  Sahoo (He/Him)

https://sites.google.com/view/a-sahoo

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Wireless Networks Division

Communications Technology Lab

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 6730

Gaithersburg, MD  20899

Ph: 301-975-4439

 

From: Claudio Da Silva <claudiodasilva@xxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 8:33 PM
To: Sahoo, Anirudha (Fed) <anirudha.sahoo@xxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: comments on document IEEE 802.11-22/0079r2

 

Hi Anirud,

 

Thanks for your review.

Your comments are on two figures (and corresponding text) that will likely be modified if a proposal being put together by the sensing session setup TTT is approved by the group.  Thus, if it is ok for you, I would prefer to incorporate your editorial comments – if they are still valid after the changes – at that point.  (This would also save us time given that the WLAN sensing overview document is already on the queue for motion.)

If the sensing session setup is not modified, we would still be able to incorporate your suggestions (for example, during comment collection).  And I’ll be glad to help with this.

Let me know if it would be ok to defer your suggestions for the time being.

Thanks,

 

Claudio

 

From: Sahoo, Anirudha (Fed) <00001823ca88828f-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2022 9:19 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] comments on document IEEE 802.11-22/0079r2

 

Hi all,

   My apologies for commenting on this document after it has been approved. I was away from the tgbf meeting due to personal leave. I have included my comments and suggested changes in the document (with track changes).  I would also like to know if Fig. 11-41b is adding any value (or depicting a scenario that is not covered by Fig. 11-41a) to the document. If not, we should get rid of it and just keep Fig. 11-41a. Would like to hear other group members’ views.

 

thanks and regards

 

-Anirud

 

Anirudha (Anirud)  Sahoo (He/Him)

https://sites.google.com/view/a-sahoo

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Wireless Networks Division

Communications Technology Lab

100 Bureau Drive, Stop 6730

Gaithersburg, MD  20899

Ph: 301-975-4439

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1