| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Everybody, Thanks again for the discussion during today’s TGbf call.
From the SP results, I can see that there is still more discussion we need to have before converging on the measurement timestamp topic. The main point I was hoping to resolve with the contribution today was: how will the timestamp make its way to the Application, and who will provide it. With that, I’m looking to collect some offline feedback. I’m happy to hear any comments or questions that were not able to make it into the queue. I also mentioned my preference was option 1, but that was based on the reasons listed on slide 12. I saw there were several votes for option 2, so I’m curious if there was anything I may have overlooked or not considered
on slide 12. I’m also interested to collect any comments from those who voted
Option3 - Further Discussion on signaling of Timestamp, relating to the details or concerns you would like to see further discussed. Thanks and regards, -Chris To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |