| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Steve, My apologies if this question has been asked/answered before. Why are we trying to “simplify” the CSI quantization method? The 802.11n spec based “real valued scaling” is already available in commercial products, right? If yes, then vendors have already implemented the more complex real valued scaling
based CSI reporting. If the implementation is already there and the accuracy is better than any of the proposals currently in tgbf, why simplify it? If we mandate a simpler, but less accurate method in the standard, then it would prevent vendors from implementing
more accurate (albeit more complex) method for CSI. thanks and regards -Anirud Anirudha (Anirud) Sahoo (He/Him) https://sites.google.com/view/a-sahoo National Institute of Standards and Technology Wireless Networks Division Communications Technology Lab 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 6730 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Ph: 301-975-4439 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |