| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Cheng and other members who care about this topic, As suggested by Ali, we may
have “Terminate All” include two bits: terminate All NTB, terminate All TB. The reason is that additional 1 bit (small overhead) can provide selectivity as the use case on one
side can stop without the other side. For example, in order to save power or allocate more resource to communication services, a STA may want to terminate all use cases initiated by AP, and keep all
the use cases initiated by itself. This example is reasonable, because in the use cases initiated by AP, STA may only do a favour. But in the use cases initiated by STA itself, the sensing measurement
and sensing result are important. I’d like to hear your opinion on this change: “Terminate All” include two bits: terminate All NTB, terminate All TB. Best regards, Pei OPPO
本电子邮件及其附件含有OPPO公司的保密信息，仅限于邮件指明的收件人使用（包含个人及群组）。禁止任何人在未经授权的情况下以任何形式使用。如果您错收了本邮件，请立即以电子邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件及其附件。
This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from OPPO, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |