Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] 11bf-CC40-Trigger-comments-assignment

I tend to agree with Dibakar that we should integrate Sensing into the ranging text so that we don’t miss any of the exiting signaling/behavior. Alternatively, if you choose to take your approach of creating a new subclause for sensing, my suggestion is to include all the other signaling/behavior (more bit, MBSSID TA, HE-LTF Rep, etc.) as an Editor note (Do we need to include this?) so that we can debate & agree before merging it in.

 

I would think integrating the two would be much easier in terms of new text and figures/diagrams.

 

We would probably Trigger Sound R2R and perhaps what Mengshi suggested, Trigger CSI-threshold Report as new subvariants.

 

Regards,

Ali

 

From: Das, Dibakar <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 9:20 PM
To: dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx; osama.aboulmagd@xxxxxxxxxx; Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ali Raissinia <alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'humengshi' <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx>; rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx; 'HUANG LEI' <huang.lei1@xxxxxxxx>; 'Claudio da Silva' <claudiodasilva@xxxxxx>; tony.hanxiao@xxxxxxxxxx; narengerile@xxxxxxxxxx; STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx; insun.jang@xxxxxxx; sanggook.kim@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 11bf-CC40-Trigger-comments-assignment

 

WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.

Hi Dongguk,

 

Thanks for sharing the document. Few comments:

  1. “Figure 9-xxx - Trigger Dependent Common Info subfield for the Sensing Trigger variant” is actually shared by both Ranging and Sensing Trigger frames. As such the figure title and associated text should reflect that.
  2. The format of the Poll TF::User Info seems to be same as Ranging TF-Poll. If so, may be simpler to just say, the format is defined in Fig-xx (reference to Ranging TF Poll:User Info) and not repeat the associated text.
  3. Do we need to signal Measurement ID anywhere in the TFs ?
  4. Not all the bits in B12-B25 are reserved in 11az TF-sounding. Not sure why we need to change this for sensing.

 

Regards,

Dibakar

 

 

 

Dear TTT members,

 

I would like to share the CR document for the resolution of CIDs related to the “Tigger” topic.

Attached please find and take look at it.

Your comments and questions will be appreciated. Thanks,

 

Best regards,

Dongguk.

 

From: Dongguk Lim [mailto:dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2022 10:59 AM
To: 'Osama AboulMagd' <Osama.AboulMagd@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx' <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'humengshi' <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx' <dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'HUANG LEI' <huang.lei1@xxxxxxxx>; 'Claudio da Silva' <claudiodasilva@xxxxxx>; 'tony.hanxiao@xxxxxxxxxx' <tony.hanxiao@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'narengerile@xxxxxxxxxx' <narengerile@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: 11bf-CC40-Trigger-comments-assignment

 

 

Dear TTT members,

 

Thanks for your interest in the topic “ Trigger “

After requesting CIDs related to Trigger, Two CIDs (129, 561 ) were reassigned from “Threshold” to “Trigger”

Please check it in the DCN820r3. and since I didn't receive any request for CIDs, so, as I mentioned in the previous email, to resolve those CIDs and to discuss the sensing Trigger frame, all CIDs were assigned to me.

Therefore, I will prepare the initial document for that and if the drafting is finished, I will share it with you first.

Thanks,

 

Best regards,

Dongguk.

 

From: Dongguk Lim [mailto:dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2022 11:51 AM
To: 'Osama AboulMagd' <Osama.AboulMagd@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx' <dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx>; 'Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'humengshi' <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx' <dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'HUANG LEI' <huang.lei1@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx
Subject: 11bf-CC40-Trigger-comments-assignment

 

 

Dear All.

 

I am sending out this email to call for volunteers for comment resolution for Topic Trigger as described in DCN820r1.

 

Currently, 14 comments are submitted and all comments mentioned that the Sensing trigger frame should be defined.

 

So, for the consistent resolution of the above CIDs, I would like to make an initial resolution document to resolve all CIDs.

 

If you have a different opinion and if you would like to volunteer to resolve the CID, please let me know..

 

Thanks a lot and should you have any questions, please feel free to ask.

 

 

Best regards,

Dongguk.

 

 

 

 

________________________________________________________________________________________

Dongguk Lim

Chief Technology Officer IoT Connectivity Standard Task/Professional

LG Electronics Inc

19, Yangjae-daero 11-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea

M.82-10-8996-4690  E.dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx

___________________________________________________________________

 

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1