Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dear all, I presented 22/1248r0 (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/22/11-22-1248-00-00bf-sensing-measurement-report-format.pptx) on the
4th August call. Due to lack of time we didn’t have much time for questions or discussions and quite a few folks were on vacation. The proposal is related to CID 294 below and proposes replacing the Sensing Measurement Report element with field
(name TBD), in order to overcome the size limitation of 254 octets per element. In our analysis, except for very limited cases, the CSI feedback will be larger than 254 octets, requiring segmentation of the feedback if elements are used. This not only creates
overhead but also adds complexity in parsing.
I plan to run the following SP in a future 11bf call to collect feedback. However, do let me know if there are any questions/comments on this in the meantime.
q
SP: Do you agree to replace the Sensing Measurement Report element with a field? Note: The content of the field is based on the content of the Sensing Measurement Report element.
Regards, Rojan From: Sahoo, Anirudha (Fed) <00001823ca88828f-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Tony, Please add the following contribution for comment resolution (15 min)
thanks and regards -Anirud Anirudha (Anirud) Sahoo (He/Him) https://sites.google.com/view/a-sahoo National Institute of Standards and Technology Wireless Networks Division Communications Technology Lab 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 6730 Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Ph: 301-975-4439 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |