Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Julia, Added. But since your requested Motion text (first sentence) is not correct. I revised it as below, please help to double checkJ Best Regards : ) Tony Xiao
Han 发件人: Julia Feng [mailto:feng.julia.shuling@xxxxxxxxx]
Hi, Tony, Could you please add the following to the motion list? Do you agree to add fields RX_OP_Gain_Type and Rx_OP_Gain_Index along with CSI in 11bf sub-7GHz sensing measurement report
to indicate the Rx OP index or Rx gain index?
– RX_OP_Gain_Type: 2
bits (b1b0)
· 00: neither
Rx OP index nor Rx gain index is reported, and Rx_OP_Gain_Index values are invalid
· 01: Rx OP index is
reported in Rx_OP_Gain_Index. The details of receiver OP categorization method(s) are TBD
· 10: Rx gain index is
reported in Rx_OP_Gain_Index. The details of Rx gain index definition are TBD
· 11:
reserved
· Note: Receiver determines value of Rx_OP_Gain_Type
as it sees the best fit. Rx_OP_Gain_Type value doesn’t change during a sensing measurement setup. No need of capability info to use this field. No need of initiator assigning the use of this field.
– Rx_OP_Gain_Index:
· It’s a fixed size field, number of bits TBD.
· Its content depends on the value of RX_OP_Gain_Type
· Reporting value per receive antenna is TBD
SP results: unanimously supported Related document: 11-22/1254r3 Best Regards, Shuling (Julia) Feng To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |