| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| 
 Hi Julia,          Added.          But since your requested Motion text (first sentence) is not correct. I revised it as below, please help to double checkJ 
 Best Regards : ) Tony Xiao
Han  发件人: Julia Feng [mailto:feng.julia.shuling@xxxxxxxxx]
 Hi, Tony,  Could you please add the following to the motion list? Do you agree to add fields RX_OP_Gain_Type and Rx_OP_Gain_Index along with CSI in 11bf sub-7GHz sensing measurement report
 to indicate the Rx OP index or Rx gain index? 
–       RX_OP_Gain_Type: 2
 bits (b1b0) 
·       00: neither
 Rx OP index nor Rx gain index  is reported, and Rx_OP_Gain_Index values are invalid 
·       01: Rx OP index is
 reported in Rx_OP_Gain_Index. The details of receiver OP categorization method(s) are TBD 
·       10: Rx gain index is
 reported in Rx_OP_Gain_Index. The details of  Rx gain index definition are TBD 
·       11:
 reserved 
·       Note: Receiver determines value of Rx_OP_Gain_Type
 as it sees the best fit. Rx_OP_Gain_Type value doesn’t change during a sensing measurement setup. No need of capability info to use this field. No need of initiator assigning the use of this field. 
–       Rx_OP_Gain_Index: 
·       It’s a fixed size field, number of bits TBD.   
·       Its content depends on the value of RX_OP_Gain_Type 
·       Reporting value per receive antenna is TBD 
 
 
 SP results: unanimously supported  Related document: 11-22/1254r3 Best Regards,  Shuling (Julia) Feng To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1  |