| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
All, During the last meeting of the November session, the TGbh discussion spent most of the meeting discussing the first few use cases, and getting into a deep discussion about what use cases were in scope, and/or what requirements would apply to a solution for it to be in scope or not. I would like to suggest that we consider this discussion from another angle. Specifically, that the considerations that were brought up during that last meeting are good candidates for our section 6 analysis of solutions. I believe by the time the discussion had started to converge on some ideas and points to consider, that we were actually starting to list points that would/should be applied to solutions that are proposed for inclusion into TGbh, and guidelines/criteria for consideration as to whether various solutions are within our scope and/or meet our requirements (some of which might be more “nice-to-have” or tradeoff considerations than necessarily hard requirements, also). So, I’m opening this up for discussion as a way forward on our discussion. I’d like the group to consider (and respond here, on the reflector, and/or we’ll discuss on the upcoming TGbh meeting call on Dec 7) whether we should be crafting the discussion that got captured in Section 4.2 not as discussion of the use case, but as discussion of any proposed solution and its applicability. Thoughts/comments? Mark To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 |