| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Mark, Personally, I support Graham’s proposal. As the group already agreed these new use case in the regular meeting, We need provide resolution as we promised and move forward. The current status is we spend too much time to debase our agreement,
we drop into a dead cycle. Thanks Best Regards Jay Yang From: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Dear Mark, Please note that at the TGbh meeting at 13.30 today, I would like to make the following Motion: “In order to meet the PAR, the TGbh Amendment shall include a scheme or schemes that address the pre-association Use Cases identified in Document 21/332r37 as being “in-scope”.” I am assuming that this may have some lengthy debate so I am requesting that this is placed early in the agenda. Thank you, Graham To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 |