Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] Proposed text for RRCM prposal

["Zhijie Yang (NSB)" <zhijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Mark,

 

Yes, we can run the motion on 11-22/1079r4 Option1.

 

See the following clarification on the two solutions.

 

RRCM is MAC based solution, in which both sides generate RMAs based on the pre-defined equation and the RMA is used to identify the returned STA.

e-RRCM is Key based solution, in which both sides generate the pairwise key that is used for mutual identification and provide extra protection.

 

Meanwhile, I receive some improvement requirement from Dan in the reflector on the redundant Seed and RMA numbers, I can promise to improve the two aspects in the later revision.

 

Also, I receive some improvement requirements from Jarkko and Sid in the reflector and during the call, I feel these requirements should be addressed in e-RRCM scope.

I’m thinking we can extends RRCM a little in the future, e.g., to have a mode flag to indicate the two directions(generate RMA or generate the key), which could make every member happy.

 

 

 

Thanks

 

Best Regards

 

Jay Yang

 

From: mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 2023年2月26日 7:04
To: Zhijie Yang (NSB) <zhijie.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Okan Mutgan (NSB) <okan.mutgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Proposed text for RRCM prposal

 

Jay/Okan,

 

As authors of the document, can you please confirm that 11-22/1079r4 (NOTE THE REVISION!) is the latest proposal for the RRCM solution?  That is, per our straw poll on the last TGbh call, to use the RRCM proposal for our motion to add material to the TGbh Draft, that document would be our starting point for any technical discussion/clean-up before we take the motion on it?

 

(I realize that there is reflector discussion about using some/all of the e-RRCM additions, for the material that we put to motion.  But, procedurally, at this point, we have the straw poll agreement to start with RRCM, so I would like to identify exactly what that (RRCM) is, and then we can have discussion within the group (on the call) about what change we agree (probably more straw polls) to make before putting it to motion.  Those changes could include pulling in material from later revisions of 11-22/1079, if that is the group’s desire.)

 

Thanks.  Mark

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1