| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Mark, Graham, Jay, and all, I also plan to take these CIDs: 7, 18, 21, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 99, 111, 112, 113, 114. Thanks! BR, Okan From: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
OK, as I volunteered on them I did not realize there were notes there already.
From:
mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Graham/all, I have incorporated your resolution comments/notes into the r4 of the comment tracking sheet (https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1152-04-00bh-ieee-802-11bh-lb274-comments.xlsx). However, I note that this is a little complicated, in that some of those CIDs had Notes already (mostly “Submission Required”, etc., but might be more), so I had to do a ‘merge’, and as a result it is a little unclear
which notes are yours, Graham, and which were mine/pre-existing. I also note that you commented on a few CIDs that are not assigned to you (Graham). And, one CID (214) didn’t have a comment from you. So, we can _mostly_ go through these by filtering for ones assigned to you,
but not 100%. Bottom line, this is fine, for now, and we (I) can manage and sort things out. But, going forward it is probably better if anyone working on comments does actually post a document themselves, with a unique DCN, (a subset
copy of the comment tracking spreadsheet is fine, or another format, as appropriate), so that we can consider that document as a clearly distinct list of suggested response/proposed resolution from the given author. Thanks! Mark From: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Mark, Please find attached copy of the CID excel. I have written text in the Notes column for all the CIDs allocated to me. May I suggest you copy them into your official spreadsheet then they can be discussed. If you prefer that I do a more official submission, let me know, but I think that this should work. If any note is unclear please let me know. Obviously the question about whether to keep the Status fields is outstanding.
Thanks Graham From: G Smith
Hi Mark, Jay, I happily want Jay to address 40, 89, 137, 178, and 224. Thanks Jay. I think 164 is a simple “accept”, but maybe Jay knows more? Thanks Graham From:
mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Graham! Note that I already have CIDs 40, 89, 137, 164, 178, and 224 assigned to Jay. Can you guys coordinate on any proposed resolution, please? Thanks. Mark From: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Mark, I would be willing to look at following CIDs 2,3,4,5,7,21,22,23,25,37,40,49,51,81,89,114,128,135,137,140,148,149,164,168,169,178,193,196,197,198,207,208,224,240,214. I will do my best to do these in a timely manner. Many require decision on the Status field. Graham From: Mark Hamilton <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
All, I have uploaded a slight update to the TGbh comment tracking spreadsheet, here:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/23/11-23-1152-02-00bh-ieee-802-11bh-lb274-comments.xlsx
This update:
Talk to you all, tomorrow morning! Please be considering volunteering as Assignee for some CIDs. Mark To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 |