| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
All, I have posted an update to the MDR (and MEC) response document, to capture our consensus in yesterday’s meeting, here: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-0586-01-00bh-p802-11bh-d3-0-mdr-report-response.docx. Please help me review and confirm it is correct. Note that we also agreed to have Carol make the updates to the <ANA> assignments, and check for other “magic numbers” that may need to be aligned/coordinated with any other revision/amendment projects. I have also uploaded a proposed comment resolution spreadsheet, to capture (I believe) the consensus resolutions, per yesterday’s meeting, here: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-0380-02-00bh-ieee-802-11bh-lb283-comments.xlsx. I believe this captures actual/formal resolutions aligned with the Notes we discussed and agreed. Please help me review and confirm. And, one last reminder that we also have consensus to direct the Editor to make the changes described in: https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-0539-00-00bh-bit-assignment-of-optional-subelement-ids-for-beacon-request.pptx, which is to say use the values 166 and 167 for “IRM Recommendation” and “Measurement ID” so that the value 165 can be used for “Bandwidth Indication”. I believe the above are all the changes needed to our Draft, to produce a D4.0, and be ready for WG LB recirc, and take the steps to start SA ballot. Once again, please help me review and let me know if anyone thinks anything is missing. Talk to you all tomorrow, to formalize the above actions… Thanks! Mark To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1 |