Excellent. Thanks Li Yan. I admit I concentrated on getting the device ID + PASN ID right (and compatible with your proposal) and did not pay too much attention to the rest of the diagrams.
So it’s great that you did!
Okan,
Are you OK with making these changes? As you know we have only today to get this sorted. I think we are good with Li Yan’s proposal, so we just need your Annex to be good to go.
Thanks
Graham
From: li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx <li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2024 5:15 AM
To: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: STDS-802-11-TGBH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] TGbh D4.0 Example Texts and Figures
Hi Graham and Okan,
I find some minor issues about the figures attached:
1. a typo for Asociation（should be Association）in figure 1 and 4
2. some editorial issues about brackets, please keep the round and square brackets matched
3. In figure 2(DevID FILS), i think
we don't need EAP or 4-HS if FILS used, given that FILS authen/assoc frame exchange has already established PTKSA(see P3097L10 REVME_D4.2)
4. In figure 3, you may ignore to remove PASN ID support in the beacon/probe response transmitted from AP-2(i see the frame from AP-1 is correct)
5. I'm confused about the introduction of the content of 'initial connection' in figure 1 and 3. In figure 1, initial connection is 4-HS, so it's correct to say No device ID. But in figure 3, initial connection is PASN authen. In my opinion, it's enough
to say No PASN ID. Please remove the phrase ‘No device ID’
Best Regards！
李炎 Li
Yan
Original
From: GSmith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2024年06月20日
03:41
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] TGbh D4.0 Example Texts and Figures
Hi Okan,
Here attached are the “corrected” figures for Device ID and the joint IRM/Device ID.
The IRM figures are correct and I have not touched them.
These figures now comply with the device ID/PASN ID proposal as per 24/0789r7. (I have sent edits on this document to Li Yan)
All that remains is make the text agree with the figures :>) Hopefully that should not be difficult.
I was confused by the last figure as it jumped form 4w HS to PASN and back. I simply made it a combined 4w HS example. I don’t think we need to mix PASN as well. If doing PASN, and using IRM I can’t think of any possible reason why a
STA would also try to use PASN ID.
Thanks
Graham
From: Okan Mutgan (Nokia) <okan.mutgan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2024 2:34 PM
To:
STDS-802-11-TGBH@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: G Smith <gsmith@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Yang.zhijie@xxxxxxxxxx;
li.yan16@xxxxxxxxxx; Joseph Levy <Joseph.Levy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Mark Hamilton <mark.hamilton2152@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBH] TGbh D4.0 Example Texts and Figures
Hi all,
As we discussed in the call today, to move forward, Graham volunteered to modify the example figures and text (thanks a lot Graham) for this
submission.
Jay and Yan Li, as well as others, are also welcome to put any input.
Thanks!
BR,
Okan
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBH list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBH&A=1