| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hello all, My SP (24/0837) will run this Thursday's TGbn Joint call (June 20). Before casting the SP, I would like to answer members' questions. Thanks, Necati,
Gaius, and Rakesh, for your comments! The SP text is; Do you agree that indicating the use case is beneficial in 11bn? -Yes/No/Abs https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-0837-00-00bn-indication-of-use-case-in-11bn.pptx 1)What is the "Use Case" indicated in this contribution? I intend the term "Use Case" to stand for the characteristics of the network to which the AP that indicates this information belongs. For example,
the type of access network, such as private or public networks, or the venue information defined in the Access Network Options field and Venue Info field in the Interworking element are suitable for "Use Case" information. Please see the APPENDIX in my contribution. Moreover, I think we can newly define and indicate the network type of "Latency Sensitive Network" or applications such as "XR/VR" or "assembly line
in IIoT" as for "Use Case." 2)Is any normative behavior with the use case indication expected? I haven't expected any normative behavior so far because I think using this information will be left to implementation or vendor-specific (it may
not be defined in 11bn). However, this information will be helpful for Wi-Fi reliability. For instance, if the BSS's use case is a latency-sensitive network, the other BSSs can avoid using the channels or links that the BSS utilizes.
3) What kind of indication and granularity is expected? Those are future discussion items, but I expect that we can indicate the kind of information shown in the Access Network Options field and Venue
Info field in the Interworking element defined in 11u. This element's granularity of information may be reasonable. However, the information defined in 11u was outdated, and we could update or redefine it for the UHR.
4)Will there be a dictionary of use cases and their index? If we reuse the Interworking element, there are a lot of Venue type and their index (please see Table 9-66 in P802.11-2020), and we can reuse it.
There are still a lot of non-defined indexes. Any comments are welcome. Best regards, Akira ========================================== Akira KISHIDA, Ph.D. NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION (NTT) NTT Access Network Service Systems Laboratories Tel: +81-46-859-2093 Fax :+81-46-859-3145 E-mail: akira.kishida@xxxxxxx (Changed from akira.kishida.fs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |