Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Request to run SP



Hi Dmitry,


I second Lili's suggestion.





Thanks


Best Regards


Jay Yang (杨志杰)



Original
From: LiliHervieu <000027d47e67a751-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date: 2024年07月19日 03:42
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Request to run SP

Hello Dmitry,

 

Would you consider removing the part of text in red – it is too restrictive at this time.  Also, in line with some comments in earlier presentations, the impact on legacy clients should include both throughput and latency (in green).

 

Thanks,

Lili

 

 

From: Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 3:31 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Request to run SP

 

 

Hi Alfred,

 

I would like to run the following  strawpoll on HiP EDCA in the upcoming PM2 session

Do you agree to improve EDCA to reduce tail access delay of Low Latency traffic in multi-BSS dense scenarios in presence of best effort traffic?

•             The solution to improve EDCA is distributed

•             The impact on legacy device has to be balanced in terms of throughput and latency

•             Low Latency traffic is treated as AC_VO traffic. Other cases are TBD

 

Regards,

Dmity


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1



To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1