Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Dmitry,
I second Lili's suggestion.
Thanks
Best Regards
Jay Yang (杨志杰)
Hello Dmitry,
Would you consider removing the part of text in red – it is too restrictive at this time. Also, in line with some comments in earlier presentations, the impact on legacy clients should include both throughput and latency (in green).
Thanks,
Lili
From: Akhmetov, Dmitry <Dmitry.Akhmetov@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2024 3:31 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Request to run SP
Hi Alfred,
I would like to run the following strawpoll on HiP EDCA in the upcoming PM2 session
Do you agree to improve EDCA to reduce tail access delay of Low Latency traffic in multi-BSS dense scenarios in presence of best effort traffic?
• The solution to improve EDCA is distributed
• The impact on legacy device has to be balanced in terms of throughput and latency
• Low Latency traffic is treated as AC_VO traffic. Other cases are TBD
Regards,
Dmity
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1