| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
[2] From another WG chair e-mail:
Q: Recorded votes of motions not passed by unanimous consent must be taken and included in the minutes of electronic meetings of non-CRC subgroups*. Does this requirement also apply to straw polls?
A: No. The requirement for recording the results of straw polls in the minutes is to record the tally results only.
DS Comment: This aligns with our face-to-to face operation.
Q: If a polling tool is used to collect the straw poll results (tally), are the detailed results included in the minutes?
A: No, only the tally is included. The details collected in the poll are used for validation before the results are included in the minutes (e.g. confirm recognizable name, not “zzz” as a name).
Q: If a polling tool is used to collect the straw poll results (tally), are the detailed results shared with members?
A: No. The minutes are the official record of the meeting.
· A member that has requested to run an SP may request the chair to obtain a copy of the recorded vote for SPs, and on a best effort basis, the chair may provide this information to the member. Now, since Slido only allows special (paid) accounts to save the voting results, then if there is a plan to request the results of a poll, such requests need to be made well in advance so that that meeting is attended by a TG officer that has the special account that allows the save the voting results.
Hi Alfred,
The title in the body text says “TGbn teleconference guidelines”, but the content is not limited to it.
Maybe just delete “teleconference” from the title, or change it to something like “operational”?
At the bottom of p.3, “Now, since Slido only allows special (paid) accounts to save the voting results, then if there is a plan to request the results of a poll, such requests need to be made well in advance so that that meeting is attended by a TG officer that has the special account that allows the save the voting results.”
I think it would be better if the last part is at least changed to “… by a TG officer that has the special account to save the voting results.”
# Lots of “that”…
Is there a place saying that a new contribution shall (should?) be posted before presenting it?
Wouldn’t it be good to mention so?
Best regards,
tomo
From: Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 10:15 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] Initial draft of TGbn Guidelines
Hello all,
I posted https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/24/11-24-1682-00-00bn-tgbn-guidelines.docx which contains an initial draft of the guidelines for TGbn. Most of them are inherited from 11be guidelines (some new parts i have used bold font for ease of identification.
Please take a look at them and let me know of any suggestions and/or feedback.
I also plan to quickly go over some parts of the guidelines during the Joint conf call tomorrow (in particular the item that discusses the preparatory phase for D0.1 since we are getting near to that milestone, and possibly the new parts which account for received suggestions with the intent of further improving our MO).
Regards,
Alfred
--Alfred Asterjadhi, PhD
IEEE802.11 TGbe/TGbn Chair,
Qualcomm Technologies Inc.
Cell #: +1 858 263 9445
Office #: +1 858 658 5302
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1