Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] CoEx SPs

[Sherief Helwa <00002dded7ae4daf-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Minor correction in supporting list. Please see below.

 

Regards,

Sherief

 

From: Sherief Helwa
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2024 10:48 AM
To: 'STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 'Alfred Asterjadhi' <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] CoEx SPs

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Can you please add the following SPs to the MAC queue?

 

Starting numbering from SP5 following the 4 SPs sent earlier.

 

SP5: Do you agree with the following:

• Unavailability Target Start Time is indicated using 9 bits with a granularity of 64us
• Unavailability Duration is indicated using 9 bits with a granularity of 64us

Supporting list: [11-24/543, 11-24/857, 11-24/1226, 11-24/1247, 11-24/1558]

SP6: Scheduled periodic power save on AP side is performed in UHR using Broadcast TWT with TWT ID=0 with Responder PM=1 as described in 26.8.3.2 Rules for TWT scheduling AP

Supporting list: [11- 23/1934, 11- 23/1964, 11- 23/2002, 11- 23/2040, 11-23/2078, 11-24/0509, 11-24/1558]

 

Again, should any of the group members have DCNs that match the SPs and are not in the supporting list, please let me know.

 

Regards,

Sherief

 

 

From: Sherief Helwa
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2024 8:35 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Alfred Asterjadhi <asterjadhi@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] CoEx SPs

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Would you please add the following SPs to the MAC queue (first two were already queued during September meeting)?

 

SP1: Do you support defining the following fields for unavailability indication in M-STA BA frames:

• an Unavailability Target Start Time field defined as the TSF time at which the STA becomes unavailable (duration and resolution TBD, expectation is to use a portion of the TSF)
• an Unavailability Duration field defined as the time during which the STA is unavailable (field may be not present or set to an unknown value)

 Supporting list: [11-24/543, 11-24/857, 11-24/1226, 11-24/1247, 11-24/1558]

 

SP2: Do you support to define a special Feedback Per AID TID Info field (name TBD) that carries control feedback in the M-BA frame?

• The control feedback (i.e. unavailability indication) is carried instead of the BlockAck Bitmap in that Feedback Per AID TID Info field
• The Ack Type subfield of the Per AID TID Info field is set to 0 and the TID subfield of the Per AID TID Info field is set to a reserved value
• The AID11 subfield of this Per AID TID Info field is set to a reserved TBD value if the control feedback is addressed to all STAs or to the AID11 that identifies the intended recipient STA
• The Starting Sequence Number field of this Per AID TID Info field is reserved

 Supporting list: [11-24/543, 11-24/857, 11-24/1226, 11-24/1247, 11-24/1558]

 

SP3: Define a mechanism (based on management level signaling) that allows a STA to provide an update to its peer STA of specific operational Tx/Rx parameters (which parameters is TBD, focusing generally on local constraints (for example, coexistence constraints))

 Supporting list: [11- 23/1934, 11- 23/1964, 11- 23/2002, 11- 23/2078]

 

SP4: Do you support that the parameter update mechanism based on management level signaling allows a non-AP STA to transition in/out of a limited operation/capability mode

• A STA in limited operation/capability mode changes one or more of the following TX/RX parameters: Maximum PPDU duration, Maximum MCS, use of LDPC, use of HT-immediate BlockAck, Disabled Subchannel bitmap, etc.
• Optional/mandatory TBD

 Supporting list: [11- 23/1934, 11- 23/1964, 11- 23/2002, 11- 23/2078]

 

In the meantime, if any of the members have any contributions that align with the SPs above and I missed in the supporting documents lists, then please feel free to reach out to me and share your DCN.

 

 

Regards,

Sherief

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1